Australia has a strong hand. Are we playing it well?
Advanced Manufacturing Growth Centre Chair Andrew Stevens looks at why we are still using the old "manufacturing rule book" when these rules no longer apply as manufacturing enters the world of robotics, machine learning and big data.
In sport, we wouldn’t try to win a premiership today using a game plan from the 1970s or 1990s – so why are we doing this in our manufacturing sector?
The truth is that the old manufacturing rule book no longer applies to the rapidly – and dramatically – changing field of making things, and if Australia wishes to remain globally competitive, we must adapt our manufacturing plan to win.
Game-changing advances in technology, big data and analytics, machine learning and robotics are not futuristic fantasies of what may come – they have arrived and play a large role in the success of manufacturing facilities around the globe. The familiar view of the traditional assembly lines of identical, finished goods is not the reality any more, and manufacturing is no longer simply about production.
As part of this revolution, international purchasers and consumers – Australia’s export customers – now expect their goods and services to be tailored to meet their distinct business needs or tastes. They want to be able to choose between products and solutions with different service attributes.
The question is, how can Australia win at this new frontier of globally smart manufacturing?
In short, we need a new game plan. A plan that introduces strategies that take advantage of our strengths and align with a competitive frontier that is quickly evolving.
The Advance Manufacturing Growth Centre has developed a vision for Australian manufacturing as part of a year-long investigation that we believe will accelerate our sector’s distinct competitive advantage.
These insights are contained in the recently released Sector Competitiveness Plan, which calls for a massive mindset shift in Australian manufacturing.
In the plan, we introduce a competitiveness and innovation framework that recommends our manufacturers follow a 21st century strategy of “value differentiation”. That is, to offer global customers a unique point of difference with a good or service that is exceptional in its technical leadership and value-added services.
Value differentiation may mean contributing new intellectual property, either pre- or post-production, and may include research and design, planning, engineering, innovative packaging and ongoing services in maintenance and customer engagement.
For example, Laing O’Rourke recently launched the world’s biggest 3D printer that will despatch wax moulds for concrete components from NSW to any construction site in the world. As its director told us, at a time when buildings are still being made in the same way the Pyramids were erected, Australia has the power to be a disrupter.
Manufacturers – and arguably all companies – need to continually invest in technical improvements to achieve superior performance and a unique value proposition to compete on value differentiation.>
Read CEDA's 2014 research, Advanced Manufacturing: Beyond the product line.
The Optus data breach and Australia’s recent lacklustre cyber security placing of 31 (out of 63 countries) in the latest World Digital Competitiveness Ranking (WDCR), highlights that we cannot afford to be complacent about cyber security. Aided by cyber hack toolkits obtained from the dark web, there is a rising tide of bad actors who constantly re-invent ways to obtain corporate, industrial and government data, which is then sold on the dark web and used to commit further crimes, writes David Tuffley, Senior Lecturer in Applied Ethics and CyberSecurity at Griffith University's School of Information & Communication Technology.
Read more Opinion article August 25, 2019Head of the Australia Space Agency, Dr Megan Clark AC, discusses the importance of the Australian Civil Space Strategy and the role of the space sector in the future of the Australian economy.
Read more Opinion article November 1, 2017Industry and academia can achieve great things when they collaborate. And they should do it more often, writes John Finlay-Jones.
Read more