Explore our Climate and Energy Hub
The gap between AI ambition and enterprise outcomes is widening — and only organisations that turn experimentation into disciplined execution will bridge it.
Using AI to improve productivity is no longer a future trend; it’s a present competitive lever. Boards and executive teams are under pressure to show measurable outcomes, not just proofs of concept. Many organisations have dabbled in pilots, but few have embedded AI into the fabric of their business. Scaling AI for business requires governance, cultural readiness and a clear operating model that ties AI to value.
The next wave of AI isn’t static copilots; it’s agentic systems—AI that learns, adapts and integrates across platforms with guardrails. This shift will redefine operating models, requiring robust governance and data readiness. Organisations that invest now in foundations such as data quality, interoperability and risk frameworks will be ready to harness this next frontier.
One of the biggest misconceptions about using AI to improve productivity is that it can be “turned on” like a new app. In reality, success depends on data readiness and governance discipline — areas that are having a resurgence after a wave of failed implementations.
Without clean, connected and well-governed data, even the most advanced models will underperform. Poor data quality leads to unreliable, inaccurate and biased outputs, compliance risks and eroded trust. Similarly, governance isn’t a blocker; it’s the foundation for safe experimentation and scale.
“Responsible AI is no longer a compliance exercise—it is a strategic driver for sustainable innovation and competitiveness.”
— World Economic Forum, AI Governance Alliance, 2025
“By acting decisively to address governance gaps, organisations can not only mitigate current risks but also drive sustainable innovation and growth.”
— Trust, attitudes and use of artificial intelligence: A global study 2025. The University of Melbourne and KPMG
AI for business needs to be treated as an enterprise capability, not a side project – and that starts with getting the basics right.
Without an AI operating model, pilots become dead ends. Leaders must move from curiosity to commitment: consolidating pilots, investing in data foundations and embedding AI into core processes.
What does it mean to be AI ready:
The best teams don’t win because the coach runs onto the field and scores the goals. They win because the coach uses data to analyse plays, study patterns and deliver insights that help players perform at their peak.
AI plays the same role for business.
It doesn’t replace your team—it amplifies them. It helps them play smarter, faster and with greater consistency.
But just like coaching, it’s not “set and forget.” The best teams don’t train once and call it done. They review, refine and continuously improve.
AI thrives the same way. The more feedback it gets, the better it becomes.
The future of performance won’t be humans vs AI—it will be humans elevated by AI.
AI transformation is complex. While technology is critical, success depends on orchestration—strategy, governance and cultural change. Partnership is not about outsourcing responsibility, it’s about amplifying capability and ensuring AI is embedded responsibly and effectively. There is benefit from leveraging real-world experience from organisations that have scaled AI themselves. Many organisations choose to work with partners who bring proven frameworks, accelerators and experience to reduce risk and accelerate value.
The AI boom is real. So is the risk of missing it. AI productivity won’t come from more pilots; it will come from leaders who embed AI into decisions, workflows and culture—measuring value, safeguarding people and scaling what works.
The AI divide won’t close itself. But with disciplined execution, earned trust and the right enablers, Australia can turn caution into competitive advantage.
Since the 1970s, the Australian Government has acknowledged the critical need for policy evaluation through a succession of reviews and legislative changes. Unfortunately, evaluation in the Australian Public Service remains poor. As shown by CEDA’s recent report Disrupting Disadvantage 3: Finding what works, once new policies are adopted, there is often little or ineffective follow-up. This includes a lack of resourcing and proper evaluation guidelines for organisations contracted to deliver the policies and programs. This is particularly the case in the disadvantage space, writes CEDA Graduate Economist Sebastian Tofts-Len.
Western Australia’s economy has reaped rewards from the skills and capabilities built upon the resources sector. Now is the time to leverage these advantages into new sectors and markets, writes CEDA Chief Economist Jarrod Ball and Senior Economist Cassandra Winzar.
Read more Opinion article June 3, 2020In the first in a regular series on the Australian labour market for CEDA's Recovery: coming back better project, CEDA Senior Economist, Gabriela D'Souza, shows that COVID-19 is already having a significant impact on the labour market, particularly among young people.
Read more