Explore our Climate and Energy Hub
Why is Australia’s productivity at a 60-year low? And more importantly, how do we fix it? CEDA recently hosted a Trustee Event in Melbourne in partnership with executive people solutions firm Future Leadership. A key question for guests was ‘What factors help Australian businesses to be more dynamic, and what holds them back?’
The OECD has neatly captured the concept of the “productivity paradox”: while countries invest in innovative technologies, worker productivity remains unchanged or even decreases.
According to former Productivity Commission Chair Michael Brennan, Australians have never been better educated, nor with so many people employed in research, and yet productivity is at a 60-year low. MIT research shows that transformative new technologies such as AI are not enough, saying “instead, productivity growth from new technologies depends on the invention and implementation of myriad complementary investments and adjustments”.
CEDA’s recent report, Dynamic capabilities: How Australian firms can survive and thrive in uncertain times, sought to address the role business can play in boosting productivity through sensing and seizing new opportunities, and perhaps most critically, transforming their organisations for success in these highly volatile times.
The report was based on a cross-sector survey of 149 managers, conducted in partnership with the University of Technology Sydney (UTS), which found Australian businesses overall had good dynamic capabilities, but there was room for improvement in specific areas.
At a recent roundtable hosted by Future Leadership, participants heard that while ordinary capabilities were necessary for businesses to operate effectively in a static environment, dynamic capabilities enabled businesses to thrive in a fast-changing and emergent environment.
The roundtable guests, who represented private, public, academic and for-purpose organisations, agreed that static environments were largely a thing of the past.
International Medical Robotics Academy (IMRA) chief executive Adam Clark shared the company’s experience of emerging technology adoption during the discussion.
He revealed how dynamic capabilities within his robotics firm enabled extraordinary growth in a short period of time. IMRA was originally founded in education, providing training to surgeons for robotic procedures. During the pandemic, they identified a growing problem with the availability of patients and lab animals typically used for the training, along with ethical concerns.
The diverse team lifted their eyes from their core education business, sensing an unmet need for synthetic human-tissue models for surgeons to practice on. Directing resources to the identified opportunity, the team was able to seize on the market gap and become an advanced manufacturer of these new models.
While IMRA was able to transform its business model, CEDA’s survey found Australian businesses generally lacked transformative capabilities.
The key enablers required to promote transformation in organisations include:
The Future Leadership team of organisational psychologists, executive coaches and leadership experts believe that focusing on skills alone is not the answer to building the workforce needed for the future.
The pace at which technology makes human skills obsolete, and the rapidly increasing range of skills required to stay ahead of change, mean that companies should be focusing instead on the underlying capabilities that enable the skills, mindsets, knowledge and behaviours of the future.
At a firm level, the way these resources are orchestrated and synthesised internally gives an organisation a competitive advantage hard to replicate in today’s world.
Finally, CEDA’s research provoked a robust discussion around the need for slack and agility in organisations today. When so many businesses are operating at capacity just delivering business as usual, the dynamic capabilities that do exist can be usurped or lie dormant within the routine of daily operations.
It’s time to stop directing all resources to business as usual and start intentionally creating space to embrace business as unusual. Productivity growth requires us to shift from efficiency to innovation. Future economic dynamism requires us to value space, as much as we value pace.
It is crucial that government spending at all levels delivers results and represents value for money. CEDA analysis has found that over the past decade, 95 per cent of Federal Government programs with a total cost of more than $200 billion had not been appropriately evaluated. State governments fared similarly or even worse, writes CEDA Senior Economist Cassandra Winzar and Graduate Economist Sebastian Tofts-Len.
Read more Opinion article October 10, 2022It’s a sad fact that today, more than 1.2 million Australian children and young people – or one in six – live in poverty. It is critical that targeted support is provided to families when their children most need it, and this is only possible when frontline team members have access to timely and useful data, writes Graham Jaeschke, General Manager, South Australia and the Northern Territory at the Smith Family.
Read more Opinion article November 26, 2020The well-coordinated, multilevel policy response to the effects of the COVID-19 crisis on housing show how much more effectively the housing system can work and how cooperation and coordination can create better outcomes more quickly says Swinburne University of Technology Centre for Social Impact Associate Professor, Chris Mason.