PROGRESS 2050: Toward a prosperous future for all Australians
Advanced Manufacturing Growth Centre Chair Andrew Stevens looks at why we are still using the old "manufacturing rule book" when these rules no longer apply as manufacturing enters the world of robotics, machine learning and big data.
In sport, we wouldn’t try to win a premiership today using a game plan from the 1970s or 1990s – so why are we doing this in our manufacturing sector?
The truth is that the old manufacturing rule book no longer applies to the rapidly – and dramatically – changing field of making things, and if Australia wishes to remain globally competitive, we must adapt our manufacturing plan to win.
Game-changing advances in technology, big data and analytics, machine learning and robotics are not futuristic fantasies of what may come – they have arrived and play a large role in the success of manufacturing facilities around the globe. The familiar view of the traditional assembly lines of identical, finished goods is not the reality any more, and manufacturing is no longer simply about production.
As part of this revolution, international purchasers and consumers – Australia’s export customers – now expect their goods and services to be tailored to meet their distinct business needs or tastes. They want to be able to choose between products and solutions with different service attributes.
The question is, how can Australia win at this new frontier of globally smart manufacturing?
In short, we need a new game plan. A plan that introduces strategies that take advantage of our strengths and align with a competitive frontier that is quickly evolving.
The Advance Manufacturing Growth Centre has developed a vision for Australian manufacturing as part of a year-long investigation that we believe will accelerate our sector’s distinct competitive advantage.
These insights are contained in the recently released Sector Competitiveness Plan, which calls for a massive mindset shift in Australian manufacturing.
In the plan, we introduce a competitiveness and innovation framework that recommends our manufacturers follow a 21st century strategy of “value differentiation”. That is, to offer global customers a unique point of difference with a good or service that is exceptional in its technical leadership and value-added services.
Value differentiation may mean contributing new intellectual property, either pre- or post-production, and may include research and design, planning, engineering, innovative packaging and ongoing services in maintenance and customer engagement.
For example, Laing O’Rourke recently launched the world’s biggest 3D printer that will despatch wax moulds for concrete components from NSW to any construction site in the world. As its director told us, at a time when buildings are still being made in the same way the Pyramids were erected, Australia has the power to be a disrupter.
Manufacturers – and arguably all companies – need to continually invest in technical improvements to achieve superior performance and a unique value proposition to compete on value differentiation.>
Read CEDA's 2014 research, Advanced Manufacturing: Beyond the product line.
KPMG Australia National Chairman Alison Kitchen says CEDA’s three-day State of the Nation forum in Canberra from 23-25 June showed business leaders and policymakers must choose between complacency and courage following our better-than-anticipated recovery.
CEDA CEO Melinda Cilento writes that the government should introduce a new Chief Technologist to help Australia become a leading digital nation.
Read more Opinion article November 1, 2017Industry and academia can achieve great things when they collaborate. And they should do it more often, writes John Finlay-Jones.
Read more