NEW REPORT OUT NOW
The Government’s proposed NBN reforms won’t correct fundamental structural problems within Australia’s broadband and telecommunications industry, according to Dr Michael Porter, Director of CEDA Research.
15/06/2009
Media release issued Wednesday, 17 June 2009
In a submission to the federal government's discussion paper, National Broadband Network: Regulatory Reform for 21st Century Broadband, Dr Porter argues that the number one priority for the Government is to make the structure as pro-competitive as possible and then to implement a suitable regulatory framework to manage any remaining monopoly related competition issues.
"In a sense, the Government's Discussion Paper is putting the regulatory cart before the structural horse," Dr Porter said.
The submission comments on:
The submission proposes a strategy based around:
Dr Porter suggests that the competitive tension would be created through the separation of copper and fibre optic networks form HFC cable assets.
Telstra and other carriers, in exchange for equity, would be invited to fold copper and fibre assets into a new integrated Australian network.
This network could be partly funded through Government loans and incentives to meet backhaul and black spots demands.
This company would then compete with end user suppliers such as the newly created independent cable corporation and existing wireless providers.
"What Australia needs now is not an expensive public sector rollout and regulatory expansion, but the facilitation of the potential that literally lurks beneath the surface and in the skies," Dr Porter said.
"To spend up to $43 billion of community resources on an NBN defies sound economics in an era as challenging as the once faced in 2009. The Government should not improve its economics by limiting competition; particularly in view of its plan to sell the NBN back to the private sector in five years time."
The alternative structural model outlined in the submission would create a more secure wholesale environment and increased competition among end-user providers, resulting in better service and choice for Australian consumers.
To read the full submission click here.
CEDA – the Committee for Economic Development of Australia – is an independent, not-for-profit membership organisation.
Better use of data to identify and help people before they fall into poverty and navigators to steer people to the services they need to break the circle of entrenched disadvantage are key recommendations in a CEDA report out today.
Read more Critical services July 19, 2018Strong government support for regional development is more important to Queenslanders compared to other states, while Queenslanders are less likely to feel like they have gained from economic growth and are less satisfied with work, according to results of a nation-wide poll.
Read more Critical services July 2, 2018Reduced violence in homes and communities, tough criminal laws and criminal sentences and a higher minimum wage were all issues that rated more important to Victorians compared to other states in a nation-wide poll.
Read more